Unanswered Questions about 911?

Twoofers constantly whine that there are "too many holes" in the official version ("OV") of 911. They complain that there are "too many questions" and things "don't add up."

For the most part, the things that don't add up (to them) is actually a statement on their inability to understand complex concepts. It is not an actual deficiency in the explanation. For example, it doesnt make sense to them that an amature pilot crashed an ariplane. Onstensibly, only expert, veteren, military pilot can crash an airplane.

But, most amusingly, there are many many MANY more unanswered questions within the Kookspiracy Theories. And these questons expose much bigger holes in the "Inside Job" theory than EVER were alledged about the OV.

A short list of some of the questions the Twoofers can't answer (taken from various sources).

1) How did they get Barbara Olson onto the missle that hit the Pentagon?

2) 1100 people worked the shanksville site doing various reclamation duties. Some were feds. Some local, some volunteers, and some United Airlines people. How did they get all of those 1100 people to lie and say 93 crashed there if it was diverted to Cleveland instead?

3) Some say a missle hit the pentagon, and not AA77. Assuming it was an inside job, why would the govt NEED to fake 77 hitting the pentagon, and use a missle? Air Force has dozens of 757's. A govt capable of "insiding" a 911 attack certainly would have no problem secretly obtaining a 757, and repainting it with AA's livery. So, after all the trouble of diverting 77 to some secret location, why use a missle when its equally as easy to use a real, repainted 757?

4) Twoofer claim the planes were remotely flow into the buildings. If so, why did they hit the top 20% of the building? tactically, its much better to hit as low in the buildings as you can (traps more people above the fires, and increases the likelyhood of toppling the building instantly). The could have just as easily hit the 30th floor, as they did tne 80th. Yet they didnt.

5) Regarding the pentagon "missle:" there is no missle in the world that would need to fly over the pentagon at 7k feet, then make a 330 degree descending turn to come back to the target. Any remotely flown, or computer controlled guidance would not need the descending turn. It would just fly straight in. So, who added the "turn" and why?

6) How did they fake the phone calls? Even if we accept the claim of voice sythesizers, you would still need to obtain a sample of the voices ahead of time, in order to know the "synth-voice" sounded correctly. Some of the people were last minute bookings. Reportedly, one AA flight attendant traded out of that flight a few days before, and someone else worked for her. How would they be able to get all the relevent voice samples?

7) How did they fake the personal information in the phone calls? Even assuming the nonsense about "faking" the voices, in one phone call, a passenger gave her correct combination to her safe.

8) Also, they would need not only voice samples of every passenger and crew, they would also need extensive backgrounds on every soul on board, because there is no way to know ahead of time what questions or comments might be made between the family members and the "actors" pretending to be the passengers. How was all this intel gathered, and who gathered it?

9) We were told those were not the "real" airplanes. Then where, SPECIFICALLY did the real airplanes go? Where did they actually land?

10) We are told that UA 175 and AA11 "shot a missle" just before impact. We are told about the (mythical) extra equipment "pod" underneath UA175. If it was the "real" planes that hit the WTC, then the flight crew would have noticed the "pod" during their pre-flight walk-around inspection. The fuelers and ramp workers would also have noticed. And remember, this "pod" is something twoofers tell us is sooooo obviously unusual. So, how can it be that the pilots saw the pod during their walk around and said "Hey, look! Its a missle pod on my airplane. Lets not ask any questions, and just go flying anyway."

11) If those were not the real planes, and substitute planes, why would you NEED a missle, or an extra Pod? If its not the real airplane, you could pack the whole cargo area, and every seat, with tons and tons of C4. Why would you need to shoot a missles, when you could pack much higher explosives withing the airframe?